Is hiring confidence finally returning in New Zealand?

Frog Recruitment • March 30, 2026

Hiring confidence is starting to return, but not in the loud, expansive way many might expect. Across New Zealand, the market appears to be shifting through quieter signals: more planning, more targeted hiring activity, and a growing willingness among employers to move ahead with key roles. After a prolonged period of caution, that change matters. It suggests organisations are beginning to look beyond survival and towards capability, continuity, and future performance.


This does not mean the market has suddenly become easy. Economic pressure, global volatility, and continued cost sensitivity still shape hiring decisions. Yet momentum does not always begin with sweeping moves. More often, it starts when businesses choose to act despite uncertainty. In that sense, the latest hiring sentiment is less about optimism for optimism’s sake and more about practical confidence taking hold in the market.


“Confidence is starting to translate into some real hiring intent.”


On a recent NZ Market Update, Host NZ Managing Director Shannon Barlow explored what appears to be a meaningful turning point for employers across the country. Drawing on the latest employment and salary insights, she pointed to a market that is moving from caution to measured growth mode, with organisations focusing on critical roles, future capability, and productivity rather than broad hiring pushes.


That distinction is important. The current hiring environment is not defined by rapid expansion, but by strategic movement. More employers are planning to recruit, with replacement hiring remaining a major driver, alongside business growth and changing workforce needs. Those signals suggest that while confidence is improving, employers are still being deliberate about where and why they invest in talent.


Shannon’s commentary adds another layer to that picture. Her view is that hiring momentum is visible not only in survey data but also in day-to-day conversations with employers. That matters because hiring confidence can often look stronger on paper than it does in practice. What makes this moment notable is the sense that planning is beginning to turn into action. Businesses may not be moving aggressively, but they are moving. And in a market that has spent the past few years managing disruption, that is a significant development.


There is also a broader message here for employers weighing up their next steps. External uncertainty remains impossible to ignore. Global conflict, fuel prices, and election year pressures all affect business sentiment. But waiting indefinitely for perfect conditions rarely creates progress. Momentum needs support, and that means business leaders, hiring managers, and decision makers all have a role to play in sustaining confidence rather than talking themselves back into hesitation.


That thinking aligns with one of the strongest themes emerging in the wider market. Hiring is increasingly tied to resilience and long-term capability, not just immediate vacancies. Employers are looking at productivity, role criticality, and future needs more carefully. Candidates, meanwhile, continue to assess whether an opportunity offers the right mix of security, growth, and value. In this kind of environment, hiring success will depend not only on whether companies are willing to recruit, but on how clearly they communicate opportunity and how decisively they move when the right people emerge.


Shannon also raised a timely point about talent mobility. For those still debating whether to look overseas for better prospects, her view was direct: the timing may have shifted. With signs that New Zealand’s economy could prove more resilient than many expect, and with hiring confidence strengthening locally, staying put may now offer stronger prospects than it did 18 months ago. That is not just a comment on market competition. It reflects a growing belief that New Zealand employers are preparing to re-enter the market with more intent and clarity.


The challenge now is to turn intention into sustained momentum. Hiring plans alone do not create growth. Momentum builds when employers back their strategy, make timely decisions, and invest in the roles that will shape the next phase of performance. For businesses willing to act, the early signals suggest there is reason to move forward with more confidence than the headlines might imply.


What should employers focus on as hiring confidence returns?


  • Prioritise critical roles first so recruitment effort is tied to capability, continuity, and productivity.
  • Move decisively when the right candidate appears, because measured growth still requires timely action.
  • Review how your employee value proposition speaks to stability, career development, and long-term opportunity.
  • Avoid letting external uncertainty delay every hiring decision, especially where roles are essential to business performance.
  • Use market data alongside real conversations on the ground to test whether hiring confidence is translating into genuine demand.
  • Build momentum deliberately by treating recruitment as part of business progress, not simply a response to attrition.

Grow your career and team
Get in touch with Frog Recruitment


Auckland
   I  Wellington


In business since 2002 in New Zealand, Frog Recruitment is an award-winning recruitment agency with people at our heart. Located across Auckland and Wellington, we specialise in accounting and finance, business support, education, executive, government, HR, legal, marketing and digital, property, sales, supply chain, and technology sectors. As the proud recipients of the 2024 RCSA Excellence in Candidate Care Award, we are dedicated to helping businesses achieve success through a people-first approach.

Recent articles

By Shannon Barlow • November 1, 2026
The UK's equality watchdog wants to stop employers asking job applicants about their previous salary or pay expectations. But would banning these questions create fairer pay outcomes, or could we be losing a valuable conversation? The problem isn't having a conversation about salary. It's using someone's previous salary to determine how little you can get away with paying them. That's the distinction at the heart of a debate emerging in the UK, where the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has recommended banning employers from asking job applicants about their salary history or expectations. The concern is understandable. If someone has been underpaid in a previous role, using that salary as the starting point for their next offer can mean existing inequalities follow them throughout their career. But from a recruitment perspective, there's another side to the conversation worth considering. Your previous salary shouldn't determine your future worth. Let's say two candidates apply for the same position. They have comparable experience, similar skills and the same ability to perform the role. One currently earns $80,000. The other earns $100,000. Should the employer offer the first candidate less simply because they've previously been paid less? Absolutely not. Remuneration should reflect the responsibilities of the role, the skills and experience required, internal equity and current market rates — not simply what someone managed to negotiate with their previous employer. Otherwise, people who have historically been underpaid can find themselves perpetually playing catch-up. This can be particularly problematic for people returning from career breaks, those who have prioritised flexibility over salary, and employees who have spent years with the same organisation while market rates have moved ahead. A change of employer should be an opportunity to reset remuneration against the market, rather than carry forward an outdated benchmark. But salary conversations can work in candidates' favour. While we understand the motivation behind the UK proposal, there's an important difference between asking about salary history to justify a lower offer and discussing remuneration to help someone understand their market value. As recruiters, we're constantly having conversations with employers and jobseekers about salary. Those discussions give us valuable insight into remuneration trends across different industries, professions and locations. They also allow us to challenge expectations on both sides. For employers, that might mean explaining that their proposed salary isn't competitive enough to attract the experience they're looking for. For candidates, it can mean helping them recognise that they've been underpaid and encouraging them to aim higher. Someone earning $75,000 might assume that asking for $85,000 is ambitious. But if comparable positions are paying $90,000 to $100,000, that conversation can be genuinely empowering. The objective shouldn't be to anchor someone's next salary to their previous one. It should be to help them understand what their skills are worth in today's market. Why are we so uncomfortable talking about money? New Zealanders and Australians can be surprisingly reserved when it comes to discussing salaries. We regularly encounter candidates who are uncomfortable disclosing what they currently earn or what they'd like to earn next. And that's understandable. Jobseekers want to achieve the best possible outcome, but they also worry about pricing themselves out of an opportunity. That concern can be particularly pronounced in a challenging employment market, when competition for roles is high and candidates may feel they have less negotiating power. Some people deliberately nominate a lower salary expectation because they're concerned an employer will otherwise overlook them. Others aren't confident about their market value, particularly if they haven't changed jobs for several years. This is where transparency and access to reliable salary information become particularly important. If candidates understand the market rate for their skills and experience, they're better equipped to have an informed conversation — rather than guessing what an employer might be willing to pay. What are New Zealand and Australia doing about pay transparency? Both countries have introduced changes designed to give employees greater freedom to discuss their remuneration. In New Zealand, the Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Act came into force in August 2025. The legislation protects employees from adverse action for discussing or disclosing their pay, or participating in conversations about another employee's remuneration. Pay confidentiality clauses can still appear in employment agreements, but the new protections limit how employers can enforce them. Australia introduced stronger pay secrecy reforms in December 2022. Employees have a protected right to discuss their pay, and pay secrecy clauses are prohibited in new employment contracts, with transitional arrangements applying to some older agreements. These are important steps towards greater transparency, but neither approach is the same as banning questions about salary history during recruitment. And that's an important distinction. Should employers publish salary ranges instead? One of the most practical ways to improve pay transparency is to give candidates a clearer indication of remuneration before they apply. Publishing a realistic salary range helps jobseekers assess whether an opportunity aligns with their expectations and reduces the risk of wasting time on a process that was never going to work financially. It also places more responsibility on employers to determine what a role is worth before entering the market. Rather than asking candidates what they're currently earning and working backwards from there, employers should be asking: What are the responsibilities and expectations of this position? What skills and experience are essential? What are comparable positions paying in the current market? How does the proposed salary compare with what existing employees earn? These are the questions that should establish the remuneration range. There will still be room for negotiation based on individual experience and capability, but the starting point should be the value of the role — not the candidate's salary history. What should candidates do when asked about salary? For jobseekers, preparation is key. Before entering a recruitment process, research the market rate for comparable positions and consider the full remuneration package, including benefits, flexibility, development opportunities and progression. If you're uncomfortable disclosing your previous salary, it's reasonable to steer the conversation towards your expectations for the new role. For example: "I'd prefer to focus on the responsibilities of this position and the market rate for the experience I bring. Based on my research, I'm looking for something in the range of $X to $Y." And if you're working with a recruiter, use their market knowledge. A good recruiter should be able to explain whether your expectations are realistic, identify where your current remuneration may be below market and help you approach negotiations with greater confidence. Better transparency, not less conversation. The UK proposal raises an important issue, and the principle behind it is one we support: people shouldn't be disadvantaged in their next job simply because they were underpaid in their last one. But banning conversations about salary expectations could also remove an opportunity for candidates and recruiters to have constructive discussions about market value. The focus should be on making those conversations fairer and more transparent. Employers should establish salary ranges based on the role and the market. Recruiters should challenge unrealistic expectations and advocate for fair remuneration. And candidates should feel confident discussing what they're worth without worrying that doing so will cost them an opportunity. Ultimately, the question shouldn't be "What were you paid before?" but "What is this job worth, and what value will you bring to it?"  At Frog Recruitment and people2people, our consultants work with employers and jobseekers across New Zealand and Australia, providing market insights and remuneration advice to support informed hiring decisions. If you'd like to understand how your salary or hiring budget compares with the market, get in touch with our team.
October 22, 2026
Job hugging is making workers more cautious about changing roles. Learn when staying put is sensible and when it could start limiting your career.
October 22, 2026
Meeting every job requirement may get you shortlisted, but it may not make you stand out. Find out what employers are looking for beyond qualifications.
October 22, 2026
As AI changes the job application process, discover why employers are looking beyond CVs and how candidates can demonstrate their value.
October 18, 2026
Explore New Zealand's two-speed job market, rising unemployment, skills shortages and regional recovery trends, and what they mean for employers.

Latest PR features